Reply to the notice from the provision, not from memory
Tax work turns on the exact text: the section as amended, the circular that changed the position and the ruling that settled it. Justis reads the notice or order with the transaction papers, finds the provision and authority that govern the point, drafts the reply or opinion in your style, and cites every step to its source so the position holds when it is tested.
The notice, answered point by point from the record
Each allegation in the show cause notice set against what the invoices, returns and ledgers actually show, with the provision that decides it, so the reply argues from the record rather than from a summary of it.
Structuring memos with the provision beside each step
A slump sale against an itemised sale, a merger against a demerger: the agent walks the structure through direct tax, GST and stamp duty, and writes the memo with the section, the circular and the ruling beside each step.
- Undertaking test under s.2(42C), CBDT circular considered
- Capital gains on slump sale computed under s.50B, net worth rule
- Itemised sale: depreciable assets under s.50, stock in trade as business income
- GST: transfer as a going concern, exempt under Notification 12/2017
- Stamp duty on the business transfer agreement, state schedule
- Recommendation and the ruling each conclusion rests on
Every transaction document checked for the tax it triggers
Across a data room or a group's intercompany agreements, tabular review asks the tax questions of every document at once and returns a grid: what is triggered, where the exposure sits and the page it rests on.
Your reply, drafted in your style and cited to the source
The reply or the appeal reads the way your chambers writes, with every proposition cited to the section, the circular or the ruling it relies on, and lands as a Word draft you edit rather than retype.
Legal teams already on the waitlist
“A GST reply used to start with two days of reconciling invoices against 2B. Now that comes back as a table with the page for each line, and I start from the argument about s.16 instead of from the spreadsheet.”
Common questions
Does it cover both direct tax and GST?
Yes. It searches the Income-tax Act, the CGST and IGST Acts and the rules, notifications and circulars under them, alongside Supreme Court, High Court and tribunal decisions. Every conclusion links to the provision or ruling it rests on.
Does it know the section as amended?
It works from the current text and checks live sources when it answers, and it tells you when a provision has been amended for the period in question. Where the position is unsettled it says so rather than asserting one.
Can it reconcile invoices against returns?
Upload the invoices, the ledger and the GSTR-2B export and tabular review returns a grid of what matches, what does not and the page or line for each, exportable to Excel for the reply.
Will it draft in our chambers' style?
Once you train the digital twin on a handful of your own replies and opinions, yes. It learns how you structure a reply, how you cite and how you address the authority, and edits arrive as tracked changes in Word.
Is client financial data kept confidential?
Documents are encrypted in transit and at rest, access is limited to the people on the matter, and nothing you upload is used to train models shared with anyone else. Data is hosted in India.
What does it cost?
Every account starts with a 7-day trial of 100 credits. Pro is ₹999 a month with 500 credits, Ultra is ₹3,999 with 2,000, and larger teams are on the Custom plan.
Portfolios, oppositions and infringement notices, checked against the register and the case law.
Contracts, policies and the disciplinary file, read against the labour codes and the state rules that actually apply.
Clinical establishment rules, consent, and medical negligence claims read against the record.
